Lessons Learned About Nuclear Safety From Chernobyl

  • Reactor Design
  • Human Response
  • Fail-Safe Mechanisms
  • Safety Culture
  • Fewer Nuclear Power Plants

Many people who are learning more about the 1986 Chernobyl disaster in the Soviet Union from the TV show “Chernobyl” might wonder how it changed nuclear power generation. Both reactor design and human error were at fault in the Chernobyl disaster, and along with Three Mile Island in the United States and Fukushima in Japan, this significantly changed approaches to nuclear power and how it is viewed worldwide.

Related resource: TOP 10 DOCTORATE DEGREES IN EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT ONLINE

1. Reactor Design

Today, there are still 10 reactors operating in Russia that are the same design as the Chernobyl reactor. However, the Chernobyl disaster changed how these nuclear reactors operated. Inhibitors were added to the core. Control rods were also retrofitted. Only the Soviet Union used that particular type of reactor, but in the years after Chernobyl and the fall of the Soviet Union, countries in Eastern Europe continued making safety improvements to their reactors based on lessons learned from Chernobyl. In most Western countries, light-water nuclear reactors are used. However, some experts argue that different designs under consideration worldwide may also have serious safety flaws.

2. Human Response

There were several human errors along the way that made the Chernobyl disaster worse. The accident highlighted the need for a competent emergency response plan in and around nuclear power plants. According to the Nuclear Energy Institute, evacuations did not begin until 36 hours had passed. The disaster was further worsened by secrecy around it, which was typical of the Soviet Union at the time. It meant that many people consumed contaminated food from the region before the truth about the accident was fully known.

3. Fail-Safe Mechanisms

There is a saying that armies are always fighting the previous war, meaning that they take the lessons they applied in the last conflict and apply it to the new one. Unfortunately, those lessons are often not relevant to the new conditions. This is true in the nuclear industry as well. Chernobyl changed nuclear power and raised awareness that while a similar accident could be prevented, there could still be accidents that are not anticipated. However, in addition to taking as many safety precautions as necessary, nuclear power plants can be made safer by ensuring that in the event of an unanticipated accident, a fail-safe mechanism shuts it down and prevents contamination.

4. Safety Culture

Although a fail-safe mechanism is a way to ensure that if all else fails, the population can be kept safe, this may not be necessary if a nuclear power plant has a strong safety-oriented culture. The Chernobyl disaster changed nuclear power by highlighting the importance of this. Nuclear power plant employees must value safety above the fear of admitting mistakes or releasing information about errors.

5. Fewer Nuclear Power Plants

The promise of nuclear power was that it would be safe while reliably delivering energy, even though many people were concerned about the dangers associated with using nuclear energy. According to an article in The Guardian, prior to the Chernobyl disaster, there were 409 reactors opened. Since then, only 194 have been connected. Many countries began to shut down their nuclear power plants. Three Mile Island, Chernobyl, and Fukushima led some to begin phasing out nuclear power altogether.

Along with the 2011 Fukushima disaster, Chernobyl is widely regarded as the worst nuclear accident that has ever happened. However, the Chernobyl disaster changed the nuclear power industry and made it safer worldwide.